2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (190 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (237 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7. 1983 Donkervoort S7 has automatic transmission and 2000 BMW Z3 has manual transmission. 2000 BMW Z3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Donkervoort S7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
| Make | BMW | Donkervoort |
| Model | Z3 | S7 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 206 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1080 mm |
