2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1983 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1983 Plymouth Voyager | |
| Make | BMW | Plymouth |
| Model | Z3 | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2860 mm |
