2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 206 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | Z3 | Celica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2640 mm |
