2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 211 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | BMW | Plymouth |
| Model | Z3 | Sundance |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 2211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2470 mm |
