2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (130 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (237 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (137 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | Z3 | 323 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |