2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | Z3 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |