2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (300 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | Z3 | Racoon |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 107 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1005 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2770 mm |