2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1994 Buick Regal
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Buick Regal would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Buick Regal weights approximately 29 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1994 Buick Regal | |
| Make | BMW | Buick |
| Model | Z3 | Regal |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1344 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2740 mm |
