2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1996 Acura SLX
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura SLX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura SLX would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura SLX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura SLX (190 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (167 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura SLX should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Acura SLX weights approximately 189 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura SLX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1996 Acura SLX | |
Make | BMW | Acura |
Model | Z3 | SLX |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2761 mm |