2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1996 Italdesign Formula 4
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (190 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (147 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (237 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (187 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 | |
| Make | BMW | Italdesign |
| Model | Z3 | Formula 4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 147 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2550 mm |
