2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (227 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (300 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (153 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | |
Make | BMW | Plymouth |
Model | Z3 | Pronto Cruiser |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1600 cc |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 115 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2650 mm |