2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1999 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 258 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2000 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (300 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1999 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | Z3 | Impala |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 56 L |