2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2001 BMW Z9
To start off, 2001 BMW Z9 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z9 (286 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z9 weights approximately 215 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z9 (597 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (301 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 2001 BMW Z9 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | Z3 | Z9 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 597 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 63 L |