2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (101 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 62 kg more than 2001 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (447 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (300 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 2001 Opel Omega | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | Z3 | Omega |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 447 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 99.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 91.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 60 L |