2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (300 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3. 2000 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 2002 Holden HSV has manual transmission. 2002 Holden HSV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 2002 Holden HSV | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | Z3 | HSV |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 5698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 692 Nm |
| Top Speed | 242 km/hour | 263 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
