2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2004 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 190 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 2004 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | Z3 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 2735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1576 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 61 L |
