2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2004 GMC Yukon

To start off, 2004 GMC Yukon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (295 HP) has 110 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1059 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (448 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (237 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW Z3 2004 GMC Yukon
Make BMW GMC
Model Z3 Yukon
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2488 cc 5359 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 185 HP 295 HP
Torque 237 Nm 448 Nm
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 96 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74.9 mm 92 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 9 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1355 kg 2414 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 5580 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 3310 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 L 117 L