2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2004 Marcos TS
To start off, 2004 Marcos TS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (229 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Marcos TS. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Marcos TS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 330 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Marcos TS. (224 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Marcos TS.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 2004 Marcos TS | |
Make | BMW | Marcos |
Model | Z3 | TS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2230 mm |