2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2006 GMC Yukon

To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (285 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (229 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Yukon weights approximately 990 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW Z3 2006 GMC Yukon
Make BMW GMC
Model Z3 Yukon
Year Released 2000 2006
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2979 cc 4800 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 229 HP 285 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1445 kg 2435 kg
Vehicle Length 4030 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1950 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2950 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 L 98 L