2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 131 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (229 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (300 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Commodore. 2000 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 2007 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2007 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z3 | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | Z3 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
