2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2009 Chrysler Aspen
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 2009 Chrysler Aspen | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | Z3 | Aspen |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 299 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 57 L |