2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2009 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC70 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z3. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z3.
Because 2009 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (237 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo XC70. (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo XC70.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 2009 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | Z3 | XC70 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 70 L |