2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2010 BMW 323
To start off, 2010 BMW 323 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (229 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2010 BMW 323. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z3 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 323. (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 2010 BMW 323 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | Z3 | 323 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 60 L |