2000 BMW Z3 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1270 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (301 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Z3 | Phantom |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 6092 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 100 L |