2000 BMW Z8 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 BMW Z8 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,939 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z8 (400 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 351 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z8 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z8 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z8 (500 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z8 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | Z8 | 102 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 4939 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2160 mm |