2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1950 Triumph Roadster
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Triumph Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Triumph Roadster would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1950 Triumph Roadster. (71 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1950 Triumph Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Triumph Roadster. (147 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Triumph Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1950 Triumph Roadster | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | Z9 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2390 mm |