2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1957 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1957 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1957 DKW Munga.
Because 1957 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1957 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z9 | 1957 DKW Munga | |
| Make | BMW | DKW |
| Model | Z9 | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 71 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2010 mm |
