2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z9 weights approximately 386 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | BMW | Studebaker |
Model | Z9 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2980 mm |