2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1966 Holden HD | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | Z9 | HD |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2700 mm |