2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1966 NSU 1000
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1966 NSU 1000. (53 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU 1000. (80 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1966 NSU 1000 | |
Make | BMW | NSU |
Model | Z9 | 1000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1084 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 66.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2260 mm |