2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Belmont. (246 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z9 | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | Z9 | Belmont |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 246 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2830 mm |
