2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1974 Simca 1100
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1974 Simca 1100. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1974 Simca 1100.
Because 2000 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Simca 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Simca 1100. (87 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Simca 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z9 | 1974 Simca 1100 | |
| Make | BMW | Simca |
| Model | Z9 | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1118 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 65 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2530 mm |
