2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1978 Morgan 4
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1978 Morgan 4. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1978 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z9 weights approximately 1026 kg more than 1978 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Morgan 4. (136 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z9 | 1978 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | BMW | Morgan |
| Model | Z9 | 4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2450 mm |
