2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1979 Citroen CX
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1979 Citroen CX. (107 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen CX.
Because 2000 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (166 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1979 Citroen CX | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | Z9 | CX |
Year Released | 2000 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 82 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3100 mm |