2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z9 weights approximately 686 kg more than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | Z9 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2530 mm |