2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1984 Citroen Axel

To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen Axel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen Axel would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1984 Citroen Axel. (56 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen Axel.

Because 2000 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Citroen Axel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Citroen Axel. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Citroen Axel.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW Z9 1984 Citroen Axel
Make BMW Citroen
Model Z9 Axel
Year Released 2000 1984
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4398 cc 1129 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V boxer
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 282 HP 56 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 440 Nm 81 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 74.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.7 mm 65.6 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 3730 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3110 mm 2380 mm