2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1992 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1992 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mini MK VI.
Because 2000 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1992 Mini MK VI | |
Make | BMW | Mini |
Model | Z9 | MK VI |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2040 mm |