2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault 19 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (110 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19.
Because 2000 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault 19. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | Z9 | 19 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 83.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2550 mm |