2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 639 kg more than 2000 BMW Z9.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Z9 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3510 mm |