2000 BMW Z9 vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Z9 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3010 mm |