2000 BMW Z9 vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2003 GMC Sierra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2003 GMC Sierra. (275 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2003 GMC Sierra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 GMC Sierra. (386 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | Z9 | Sierra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4816 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 386 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3380 mm |