2000 BMW Z9 vs. 2004 BMW M3
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z9. (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z9 weights approximately 137 kg more than 2004 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (350 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 2004 BMW M3 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | Z9 | M3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 328 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 1549 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2730 mm |