2000 BMW Z9 vs. 2004 Holden Combo
To start off, 2004 Holden Combo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2004 Holden Combo. (87 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Combo.
Because 2000 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Holden Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Combo. (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 2004 Holden Combo | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | Z9 | Combo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2720 mm |