2000 BMW Z9 vs. 2004 Kia KCV-4
To start off, 2004 Kia KCV-4 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Kia KCV-4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia KCV-4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z9 | 2004 Kia KCV-4 | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | Z9 | KCV-4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3310 mm |
