2000 BMW Z9 vs. 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 6,340 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,187 HP @ 6950 RPM) has 905 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z9. (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z9.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,113 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 673 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z9. (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z9.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
Make | BMW | SSC |
Model | Z9 | Ultimate Aero |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 6340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 1187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6950 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 1113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1090 mm |