2000 BMW Z9 vs. 2010 Volvo V70
To start off, 2010 Volvo V70 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Volvo V70. (232 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo V70.
Because 2000 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo V70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo V70. (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 2010 Volvo V70 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | Z9 | V70 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2820 mm |