2000 BMW Z9 vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (294 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2000 BMW Z9. (282 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW Z9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z9 weights approximately 111 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Because 2000 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW Z9 | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | Z9 | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 294 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2845 mm |
