2000 BMW Z9 vs. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo
To start off, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,691 cc, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo (510 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z9. (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z9. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo has automatic transmission and 2000 BMW Z9 has manual transmission. 2000 BMW Z9 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo | |
Make | BMW | Maserati |
Model | Z9 | Gran Turismo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4691 cc |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 84.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2056 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1353 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2942 mm |