2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 648 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Bristol Blenheim | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
| Make | Bristol | Triumph |
| Model | Blenheim | 1800 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1774 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2550 mm |
