2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1959 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 100 kg more than 1959 Chevrolet Impala.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bristol Blenheim | 1959 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | Blenheim | Impala |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3851 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3030 mm |